Skip Navigation

              
 glossary
Search
Triad Overview Triad Management Regulatory Information Technical Components User Experiences Reference/Resources
     
User Experiences
 Triad Project Profiles

Glossary: Search and browse definitions

Index: Search and browse document index

Acronyms: Search and browse acronyms

Frequently Asked Questions





Multiagency support for Triad
Triad is a Federal/State Interagency Partnership


Triad Project Profiles

The Triad Project Profiles contain information about projects that have used elements of the Triad approach. Click on an item in the list to view the detailed profile. Alternatively, you can search the profiles. To learn more about the profiles, see the About page.

Showing 1-32 of 32
1. 
  • Thorough characterization of multiple contaminants in soil in a single mobilization of less than one week
  • Development and application of field-based action levels for use with test kits
  • Collaborative use of field-based methods and laboratory methods to manage sampling and analytical uncertainty
2. 
  • Use of decision support tools (DSTs) to evaluate extent of contamination and devise an investigation and removal strategy (DSTs included the FIELDS and SADA software packages)
  • Design of a sampling and analysis program to increase data density and limit uncertainty using field-based measurement technologies and real-time decision-making
3. 
  • A large amount of data was generated for multiple contaminants and media in a single mobilization, while providing reduced uncertainty and greater confidence in assessing contaminant sources and extent
  • The City and other stakeholders were able to quickly identify a remedial strategy for this Brownfields site based on the data collected, to be in a position to move forward with property redevelopment
4. 
  • A detailed, basewide conceptual site model (CSM) was built for use as a decision making tool to support the investigation of over 300 sites and areas of concern (AOCs) addressed under the Installation Restoration Program (IRP) at NAWS China Lake
  • The study used isotope geochemistry and other in-depth hydrogeologic investigation techniques to assess the groundwater pathway to potential receptors near the base
  • The study clarified which sites and AOCs pose the greatest risk to surrounding receptors based on their location at the base, and which sites should be considered for no further action for the groundwater pathway
  • The cost savings using this approach are estimated at 50% over traditional methods involving the construction of discrete CSMs for specific sites
5. 
  • Application of an adaptive sampling strategy to minimize the mobilizations needed to completely characterize the site
  • Performance of a demonstration of method applicability (DMA) study at the beginning of the field investigation to ensure that FPXRF could meet data quality and decision objectives for the project
  • Use of FPXRF along with collaborative laboratory data to assess risk associated with lead and other metals
6. 
  • Effective systematic project planning to obtain stakeholder consensus on the objectives, conceptual site model (CSM), decision criteria, and technical approach for a complex urban redevelopment project
  • Use of immunoassay test kits to manage sampling uncertainty in the field, in combination with laboratory gas chromatography (GC) analyses to manage analytical uncertainty, to build a decision-quality database
  • A dynamic sampling program successfully demonstrated a lack of hotspots and low overall risk, allowing for fair and accurate property valuations
7. 
  • Supported through systematic project planning, immunoassay test kits were used to create a high data density in soil to support a potential no further action determination
  • Regression analyses indicated that the field test kit results and correlating contract laboratory program (CLP) results comprised a collaborative data set of sufficient quality for decision-making. The collaborative data set was used to derive a field-based action level that could be used for decision-making with the test kit results
8. 
  • Complete characterization of lead in soil in a single mobilization
  • Excavation of lead-contaminated soil completed in real-time guided by field analytical results
  • Completion of a methods applicability study designed to assess variability associated with sample preparation methods
  • Development and application of field-based action levels using x-ray fluorescence (XRF)
  • Collaborative use of field-based methods and fixed laboratory methods to manage sampling and analytical uncertainty
  • Collaborative use of field-based methods and decision support tools to limit decision and overall project uncertainty
9. 
  • Use of innovative field sampling methods including the Site Characterization and Analysis Penetrometer System (SCAPS) laser induced fluorescence (LIF) probe and Cone Penetrometer Tip (CPT) along with rotosonic drilling and microwells for sample collection
  • Design of a sampling and analysis program to increase data density and limit decision uncertainty using systematic planning, dynamic work plans and field-based measurement technologies for real-time decision-making
  • Use of a performance-based measurement system (PBMS) to determine applicability of field methods for specific site matrices, and to modify and use methods collaboratively to provide decision-quality data
  • Development of a mature conceptual site model (CSM) for evaluation and implementation of a remedial design
10. 
  • This project rolled site investigation, remediation, and close-out activities into one field deployment, accelerating the clean-up schedule and eliminating remobilization costs
  • Field-based action levels to support real-time decision-making at the Site were developed for methods that cost only pennies per sample
  • Real-time data from multiple on-site measurement methods were managed and analyzed on-site using laptops, spreadsheets, and Geographical Information System (GIS) software
11. 
  • Navy Site Characterization and Analysis Penetrometer System (SCAPS) outfitted with cone penetrometer (CPT), membrane interface probe (MIP) and direct sampling ion trap mass spectrometry (DSITMS) allowed for real-time collection of 690 feet of continuous lithologic information and volatile organic compound (VOC) concentration data
  • Collaborative use of field-based methods (CPT, MIP and DSITMS) and laboratory methods (24-hour EPA 8260B VOC groundwater data) to manage sampling and analytical uncertainty
  • Dynamic Work Strategy relied on authority given to one agency point to represent all other regulatory agencies to allow real-time decision making
12. 
  • Use of an on-site Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer (GC/MS) and other field-based methods for compliance, operational, and performance monitoring during aggressive source removal
  • Application of system monitoring data to ensure attainment of hydraulic containment goals, modify system extraction operations, and optimize treatment plant efficiency dynamically
  • Evaluation of remediation system effectiveness by organizing all site data into four independent lines of evidence
13. 
  • Multiple innovative field sampling methods including push probe groundwater sampling with an on-site lab, rotosonic drilling with sheen, dye and ultraviolet (UV) fluorescence tests to determine non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) presence, electromagnetic geophysical techniques to find buried drums and installation of multi-port wells for vertical groundwater profiling
  • Design of a sampling and analysis program to increase data density and limit decision uncertainty using systematic planning, dynamic work plans and field-based measurement technologies for real-time decision-making
  • Development of a mature conceptual site model (CSM) necessary for evaluation and implementation of a remedial design
14. 
  • Application of an adaptive sampling strategy to minimize the mobilizations needed to completely characterize the site
  • Use of membrane interface probes (MIP) and direct sampling ion trap mass spectrometry (DSITMS) along with collaborative laboratory data to assess risk associated with tetrachloroethene (PCE) and carbon tetrachloride
  • High-density sampling approach used to obtain consensus that high level contamination (i.e., source area) is very limited
15. 
  • Systematic planning used detailed information from a sister facility to fill in operational history data gaps and select compound-specific, real-time measurement technologies
  • A dynamic field investigation located and determined the magnitude of multiple source areas containing chlorinated solvents and petroleum compounds in soil and groundwater in a single mobilization
  • Field-based methods and fixed laboratory methods were used collaboratively to manage sampling and analytical uncertainty, increasing sample coverage at the Site without significantly increasing costs
16. 
  • Delineation of "hot spots" using real time field-based analytical methods
  • Reduction in volume of contaminated soil to be remediated by more precisely delineating the contaminated areas
  • Use of field-based methods to lower expenses of remedial activities, reduce insurance premiums, and gain buyer interest
  • Application of field-based methods to manage overall project uncertainty
17. 
  • This project demonstrated that significant cost savings can be achieved even at a project that is small in scope using the Triad approach ($9,000 total remedial action cost).
  • Removal of jet-fuel contaminated soils was directed using real-time field measurement of soil headspace. The Conceptual Site Model was simultaneously refined, and the location for in situ treatment of groundwater was adjusted during the same field program to address previously unknown areas of impact.
18. 
  • Development of an evolving conceptual site model (CSM) to determine the source and extent of contamination at a complex site.
  • Thorough and cost-effective site characterization using innovative sampling and field-based analytical technologies.
  • Secured cooperation of potentially responsible parties through systematic planning and building a CSM.
  • Refinement of CSM allowed project team to focus efforts where needed to support delineation of nature and extent and design of a remedy.
19. 
  • Although targeted sites had been stalled in the state underground storage tank (UST) petroleum release compensation fund program (some, for as long as 10 years), conceptual site models at each of the 5 sites were sufficiently refined using a Triad-based approach to allow corrective action plans (CAPs) to be prepared.
  • Team members were able to move from project planning through a three-week period of data collection to preparation of CAPs in two months.
  • Documented savings of $109,000 for 3 of the 5 sites where prior investigations had been completed.
  • Real time measurement systems (membrane interface probes [MIPs]) were linked to laboratory methods in collaborative data sets in order to manage sampling and analytical uncertainty.
20. 
  • Systematic planning for excavation and treatment of contaminated soil from more than 80 sites
  • Substantial efforts to develop social capital needed for project success
  • Cost savings of more than $24 million compared with off site transport and treatment
21. 
  • Application of a dynamic sampling strategy to minimize time lag for confirmation data during soil removal activities
  • Use of FPXRF to increase sample numbers and reduce uncertainty associated with site heterogeneity
22. 
  • Use of microextraction techniques to allow rapid and cost effective analysis of PAHs.
  • Collaborative use of microextraction analysis, field kits and fixed laboratory data to manage sampling and analytical uncertainty.
  • Increased data density allowed regulatory team members make more confident decisions regarding the level of characterization at each site.
23. 
  • A demonstration of EPA Method 4020 (immunoassay) method applicability for sediments in a regulatory context.
  • Application of an adaptive sampling strategy to minimize the number of field mobilizations.
  • Adaptive sampling approach used to obtain consensus on Conceptual Site Model and to support a regulatory decision.
24. 
  • Microextraction techniques allowed rapid and cost effective analysis of chlordane and other pesticides.
  • Increased data density allowed regulatory team members to make more confident decisions regarding the level of characterization.
  • The Triad-based approach allowed MacDill Air Force Base (MAFB) to proceed from project planning to the development of a site remedy in 6 months.
  • The Triad-based investigation leveraged a partnership and social capital already established between MAFB and the regulators.
25. 
  • Use of field-based innovative technologies to make real-time decisions during site characterization activities.
  • Statistical correlations developed between innovative field-based analysis methods and proven fixed-laboratory analysis methods.
  • Development of a robust dynamic work plan based on precise decision logic achieved through systematic project planning.
  • Site closure eminent within 10 months after the initiation of the Triad-based site investigation.
26. 
  • Nature and extent of pesticide- and dioxin-affected soils were fully characterized in a single mobilization.
  • Extent of soil contamination, and thus excavation and treatment volumes, were precisely identified prior to initiation of soil excavation activities.
  • Consequently, confirmation sampling and analysis (typically performed to confirm that all contaminated soil has been remediated) was eliminated, thus eliminating these sampling and analysis costs as well as cost and schedule uncertainties associated with conventional soil remediation.
  • The process and results received regulatory approval, was performed within schedule, and resulted in verifiable cost savings of over $300,000.
27. 
  • Integrated site characterization and remediation project included characterization, excavation, and segregation of soil based on results from on-site analyses using immunoassay (IA) test kits.
  • Cost savings were realized through reduced analytical costs (compared with traditional fixed-based laboratory analysis), reduced waste volumes for treatment/disposal, and reduced mobilization/demobilization costs that would have been incurred if multiple mobilizations were required.
  • The project cost of $589,000 was about half the $1.2 million estimated for a more traditional site characterization and remediation scenario.
28. 
  • Use of the Triad approach within the framework of the multi-agency radiation survey and site investigation manual (MARSSIM)
  • Systematic planning conducted with data users and regulators to develop a conceptual site model (CSM) for remedial action, and to derive site-specific cleanup levels using MARSSIM
  • Use of total uranium concentration as a surrogate value to represent radionuclide contaminants of concern (COCs) for the purposes of field-based decision-making
  • Collection of a single data set to support site characterization data needs, excavation planning needs, and closure requirements, incorporating direct push technology (DPT) and real-time X-ray fluorescence (XRF) measurements to save costs and expedite remedial design
29. 
  • The use of the Triad approach saved the Air Force over 50 percent in analytical costs ($830,000) and about 25 percent in total project cost (approximately $5 million), while condensing a remedial action from three construction seasons to two.
  • An on-site laboratory provided data of sufficient quality, as such planned off-site laboratory analyses for "confirmation" purposes could be eliminated.
  • Correlations established between on-site total contaminant concentrations and toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) results allowed the use of the on-site total concentration values for waste disposal decisions.
30. 
  • A broad range of contaminants and source areas were delineated in a single, 5-week field program, such that remedial activities and property transfer could proceed efficiently to the satisfaction of developers and regulators.
  • 30,000 analytical results were generated and communicated in real-time using data management and decision support tools.
  • A previously-unknown chlorobenzene plume was found and delineated in four days through an adaptive sampling program.
31. 
  • Development of a conceptual site model (CSM) to identify preferential pathways for migration of free petroleum product and associated vapors to potential receptors.
  • Use of the Rapid Optical Screening Tool (ROSTTM) along with other field-based measurement technologies and traditional soil and core analyses to identify the nature and extent of contamination associated with released free product.
  • Compilation of collaborative data sets to predict where vapor migration issues might be encountered and where product removal efforts should be concentrated.
  • Application of heuristic work strategies to constantly evolve the CSM and pinpoint critical data gaps for later investigations.
  • Use of the CSM to develop a consensus vision among a broad stakeholder group concerning the direction of field studies and the design and evaluation of treatment systems.
32. 
  • A plume of chlorinated solvents in groundwater and a smear zone of contaminants associated with Stoddard solvent were delineated in a single, 14-day field program.
  • Over 4,500 analytical results were generated and communicated in real-time using data management and decision support tools.
  • The real-time data set allowed for immediate implementation of a remedial strategy (the removal of 500 cubic yards of soil in the unsaturated zone followed by a natural attenuation monitoring program).
  • The rapid implementation of the remedy to the satisfaction of all stakeholders (within 5 months of site discovery) allowed a critical national defense construction project to be completed on schedule.


To suggest a new profile, or to update an existing profile, contact us.



E-mailE-mail this page

Home | Overview | Triad Management | Regulatory Info | Technical Components | User Experiences | Reference/Resources
News | Glossary | Document Index | Acronyms | FAQs
Privacy/Security | Site Map | Contact Us | E-Mail Announcements